Grantmakers › California

Lucile Packard Foundation for

Palo Alto, CA · EIN 77-0440090. Reported 93 grants totalling $673.5M to 37 organizations across tax years 2020-2024, on Form 990 Schedule I.

37organizations funded
$100,000median reported grant
$673.5Mgranted, 2020-2024
39%of grantees funded again the next year
57%of dollars to its largest recipient

Does this grantmaker accept applications?

Its tax return does not say, and we will not guess. Private foundations file Form 990-PF, which asks outright whether they fund only organizations they select themselves -- 78% say yes, and that one answer is what lets the rest of this site tell you which foundations are worth approaching. Grantmaking charities like this one file a regular Form 990 instead, and the IRS never puts the question to them. Anyone claiming to know the answer from the filing is inventing it.

Three things in the filing do bear on it:

  1. What kind of organization it is. For Lucile Packard Foundation for, by its IRS classification it exists to support one specific institution in health care -- typically its own parent hospital, university or school (NTEE E110).
  2. How spread out its giving is. 37 distinct organizations, with 57% of the dollars going to the largest single recipient. That is concentrated. Most of the money has a settled destination, and the remainder is what is realistically in play.
  3. How much its list changes. 39% of one year's grantees are funded again the next, across 4 year-to-year transitions. That is below the 56% median for grantmaking charities, and well below the 67% median for private foundations. It describes the organizations it already funds, not whether it would consider a new one.

How big are its grants?

The median reported grant is $100,000. Half of what it reported fell between $44,853 and $254,192; the smallest was $6,000 and the largest $135.1M. If you are asking for materially more than the top of that range, you are asking the wrong organization.

Schedule I only reports grants over $5,000. Form 990 requires a charity to list recipients it paid more than that and lets it omit the rest, so every grant-size figure on this page describes the grants it reported, not all of them. Its real median is lower and its real recipient count is higher. This is also why these numbers cannot be compared with the private-foundation figures elsewhere on this site -- Form 990-PF has no reporting floor, so the two are different populations rather than two samples of one.
$5,000 - $10,000
6 grants
$10,000 - $25,000
10 grants
$25,000 - $50,000
13 grants
$50,000 - $100,000
17 grants
$100,000 - $250,000
22 grants
$250,000 Or More
25 grants

Every organization it funded

This is the complete list from its filings, largest first. Recipients are grouped by the EIN the filer reported, not by name, so an organization that was typed differently in two years appears once rather than twice.

OrganizationLocationTotal receivedGrantsYears fundedLast
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior UniversityStanford, CA$384.6M1052024
Lucile Salter Packard Childrens Hospital at StanfordPalo Alto, CA$276.0M1352024
Family VoicesConcord, MA$2,121,539532024
Population Reference Bureau IncWashington, DC$1,700,000112020
University of California San FranciscoSan Francisco, CA$1,320,914532024
The National Alliance to Advance Adolescent HealthWashington, DC$858,314542024
Support for Families of Children With DisabilitiesSan Francisco, CA$725,590432022
Duke UniversityDurham, NC$674,237222024
Tides CenterSan Francisco, CA$579,036432024
Center for Health Policy DevelopmentWashington, DC$540,259222023
National Health Law Program IncLos Angeles, CA$520,000442023
National Opinion Research CenterChicago, IL$382,405112023
Children NowOakland, CA$358,960432023
University of PittsburghPittsburgh, PA$353,202112021
Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore, MD$348,346222023
University of UtahSalt Lake City, UT$338,520112023
Institute for Family-Centered Care IncBethesda, MD$284,452322024
University of ChicagoChicago, IL$254,192112024
The Childrens PartnershipLos Angeles, CA$250,000332023
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemMadison, WI$178,947112023
Trustees of Columbia UniversityNew York, NY$155,636112020
Generation Patient IncGreenwood, IN$141,326112024
Arc CaliforniaSacramento, CA$130,000112024
University of DenverDenver, CO$122,195112020
Public CounselLos Angeles, CA$115,140112021
Health Leads IncBoston, MA$50,000112023
Jacobs Heart Children's Cancer Support ServicesWatsonville, CA$50,000112020
Trustees of Boston UniversityBoston, MA$50,000112023
University of Colorado DenverAurora, CO$49,564112022
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities-Bay AreaPalo Alto, CA$29,000222024
There With Care of the Bay AreaRedwood City, CA$29,000222024
Coastal Kids Home CareSalinas, CA$27,500222024
Jacobs Heart Childrens Cancer Support ServicesWatsonville, CA$27,500222024
Little Lobbyists Family AllianceSilver Spring, MD$25,000112024
George Mark Childrens FundCastro Valley, CA$20,000112022
Choc FoundationOrange, CA$17,204112021
Childrens Specialty Care CoalitionSacramento, CA$15,000112021

18 of 37 (49%) received money in more than one year over the 5 years we hold. Remember the $5,000 floor: an organization funded every year at $3,000 shows up here as never funded at all.

What the money was for

Taken verbatim from the purpose column of its filings, largest first. This is the closest thing to a statement of what it funds, in its own words.

What kind of organizations it funds

By the activity category the IRS assigns each recipient, for the 29 of 37 recipients we could match to a registered organization. The categories are the IRS's, not ours -- Schedule I reports the recipient's EIN, so this is a lookup rather than a name match.

Health Care
10 orgs
Education
9 orgs
Human Services
6 orgs
Social Science
2 orgs
Crime & Legal
1 org
Community Improvement
1 org

Giving by year

Tax yearGrants reportedTotalMedian grant
202016$138.4M$99,647
202117$111.8M$155,000
202223$170.1M$44,162
202321$121.8M$178,947
202416$131.3M$115,000

Tax years, not calendar years, and the most recent year is usually incomplete -- Form 990 arrives about a year after the year it covers, so a low final year means late paperwork rather than a grantmaker winding down.

Where its money goes

99% of its giving went to organizations in California. Community foundations and federated funds are usually the most geographically bounded funders there are -- being outside the footprint is normally disqualifying in a way that a weak programme fit is not.

California
$664.8M
District of Columbia
$3.1M
Massachusetts
$2.2M
North Carolina
$674K
Maryland
$658K
Illinois
$637K
Pennsylvania
$353K
Utah
$339K

Down to the city

Stanford, CA
$384.6M
Palo Alto, CA
$276.1M
Washington, DC
$3.1M
San Francisco, CA
$2.6M
Concord, MA
$2.1M
Los Angeles, CA
$885K

Get funders for your state and cause by email

We email you funders that gave to organizations in your state and cause, up to five at a time each week and never the same one twice, from their own IRS filings. Free. The weekly email has not started yet.

Unsubscribe in one click from any email. We never sell or share your address. To match on your organization and typical grant size too, keep a private profile.

Funders that support the same organizations

These grantmakers and private foundations gave to organizations this one also funded. Shared grantees are a sign of overlapping priorities and nothing more: they do not show that any of these funders would consider a new organization. Each page says what its filings show.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund18 shared recipientsAmerican Online Giving Foundation Inc13 shared recipientsDonor Advised Charitable Giving Inc12 shared recipientsSilicon Valley Community Foundation11 shared recipientsMorgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc9 shared recipientsNational Philanthropic Trust8 shared recipients

How to approach this grantmaker

  1. Look for a published programme first. Unlike most private foundations, organizations of this kind often do run open, deadlined grant cycles with written guidelines. Its own website is the authority on that; this page is the authority on who it has actually paid.
  2. Check you are its size. The median reported grant is $100,000 -- and because grants under $5,000 need not be reported, it very likely writes smaller cheques than this page can see.
  3. Check you are in its geography. Its giving concentrates in California.
  4. Read the recipient list for organizations like yours. If nothing on it resembles your work, that is a real answer and a cheap one to get.

Related guides

Foundations funding health care in CaliforniaEvery funder in this groupFoundations funding education in CaliforniaEvery funder in this groupFoundations funding human services in CaliforniaEvery funder in this group

Where these numbers come from

Everything above is taken from Lucile Packard Foundation for's own Form 990 Schedule I filings, which the IRS publishes in bulk. We used 5 returns (tax years 2020-2024). Grant figures are from its returns. Recipient classifications, the concentration and retention figures and the funders that support the same organizations are our own calculations from them, described in how we build this.

On its most recent return it told the IRS it made grants to 16 section 501(c)(3) organizations and 0 other organizations. That is the filer's own count for one year; the totals above cover every year we hold.

Address of record on the latest return: 400 Hamilton Avenue Suite 340, Palo Alto, CA, 94301.

EIN 77-0440090 · See the original filings on ProPublica · How we build this

This is history, not an open call. Form 990 is published about a year after the tax year it covers. Nothing on this page is a deadline. It is a record of who this organization has actually funded.

Is something here wrong about your organization? Email [email protected] and we will correct it.