Grantmakers › California

Parks California

Sacramento, CA · EIN 83-1523594. Reported 285 grants totalling $14.7M to 175 organizations across tax years 2021-2025, on Form 990 Schedule I.

Does this grantmaker accept applications?

Its tax return does not say, and we will not guess. Private foundations file Form 990-PF, which asks outright whether they fund only organizations they select themselves -- 78% say yes, and that one answer is what lets the rest of this site tell you which foundations are worth approaching. Grantmaking charities like this one file a regular Form 990 instead, and the IRS never puts the question to them. Anyone claiming to know the answer from the filing is inventing it.

Three things in the filing do bear on it:

1. What kind of organization it is. For Parks California, the IRS classifies it under environment rather than as a grantmaker (NTEE C36) -- it is an operating charity that also makes grants.
2. How spread out its giving is. 175 distinct organizations, with 6% of the dollars going to the largest single recipient. That is genuinely spread out -- the mark of a funder making many independent decisions rather than underwriting one institution.
3. How much its list changes. 46% of one year's grantees are funded again the next, across 4 year-to-year transitions. That is below the 56% median for grantmaking charities, and well below the 67% median for private foundations. It describes the organizations it already funds, not whether it would consider a new one.

How big are its grants?

The median reported grant is $31,921. Half of what it reported fell between $20,000 and $53,974; the smallest was $5,908 and the largest $300,000. If you are asking for materially more than the top of that range, you are asking the wrong organization.

5 of those grants were non-cash -- goods, property or services worth $79,706 in total. In-kind giving is real support but it is not a cheque.

Every organization it funded

This is the complete list from its filings, largest first. Recipients are grouped by the EIN the filer reported, not by name, so an organization that was typed differently in two years appears once rather than twice.

69 of 175 (39%) received money in more than one year over the 5 years we hold. Remember the $5,000 floor: an organization funded every year at $3,000 shows up here as never funded at all.

What the money was for

Taken verbatim from the purpose column of its filings, largest first. This is the closest thing to a statement of what it funds, in its own words.

• Fernandeo Tataviam Band of Mission Indians $285,192 · 2024
  2024 ARTS IN PARKS GRANT AND 2024 ROUTE TO PARKS GRANT
• Save the Redwoods League $277,600 · 2022
  FOREST MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR SANTA CRUZ REDWOODS PARKS
• Golden Gate National Park Conservancy $249,038 · 2021
  STEWARDSHIP 2021: SHAPING THE FUTURE OF LANDSCAPE-SCALE STEWARDSHIP AND NRD DEFERRED MAINTENANCE & DATA PRIORITIES
• Yurok Tribe $180,000 · 2025
  2025 CAREER PATHWAYS GRANT & 2026 ROUTE TO PARKS GRANT
• Trybe Inc $163,599 · 2025
  2025 ARTS IN CALIFORNIA PARKS GRANT
• Jamul Indian Village of California $160,000 · 2025
  2025 ROUTE TO PARKS GRANT & 2026 ROUTE TO PARKS GRANT

What kind of organizations it funds

By the activity category the IRS assigns each recipient, for the 132 of 175 recipients we could match to a registered organization. The categories are the IRS's, not ours -- Schedule I reports the recipient's EIN, so this is a lookup rather than a name match.

Giving by year

Tax years, not calendar years, and the most recent year is usually incomplete -- Form 990 arrives about a year after the year it covers, so a low final year means late paperwork rather than a grantmaker winding down.

Where its money goes

96% of its giving went to organizations in California. Community foundations and federated funds are usually the most geographically bounded funders there are -- being outside the footprint is normally disqualifying in a way that a weak programme fit is not.

Down to the city

Funders that support the same organizations

These grantmakers and private foundations gave to organizations this one also funded. Shared grantees are a sign of overlapping priorities and nothing more: they do not show that any of these funders would consider a new organization. Each page says what its filings show.

How to approach this grantmaker

1. Look for a published programme first. Unlike most private foundations, organizations of this kind often do run open, deadlined grant cycles with written guidelines. Its own website is the authority on that; this page is the authority on who it has actually paid.
2. Check you are its size. The median reported grant is $31,921 -- and because grants under $5,000 need not be reported, it very likely writes smaller cheques than this page can see.
3. Check you are in its geography. Its giving concentrates in California.
4. Read the recipient list for organizations like yours. If nothing on it resembles your work, that is a real answer and a cheap one to get.

Related guides

Where these numbers come from

Everything above is taken from Parks California's own Form 990 Schedule I filings, which the IRS publishes in bulk. We used 5 returns (tax years 2021-2025). Grant figures are from its returns. Recipient classifications, the concentration and retention figures and the funders that support the same organizations are our own calculations from them, described in how we build this.

On its most recent return it told the IRS it made grants to 83 section 501(c)(3) organizations and 2 other organizations. That is the filer's own count for one year; the totals above cover every year we hold.

Address of record on the latest return: 901 H Street Ste 120 294, Sacramento, CA, 95814.

EIN 83-1523594 · See the original filings on ProPublica · How we build this

Is something here wrong about your organization? Email [email protected] and we will correct it.